🤑 Big Banks vs. GENIUS Act: A Tale of Greed and Folly 🤑

by

Opinion

In the grand theater of Washington, where principles are as fleeting as shadows and compromise is the only enduring virtue, the GENIUS Act emerged as a rare beacon of bipartisan harmony. 🕊️ After months of negotiation-a dance of egos and interests-Congress birthed a stablecoin framework, a monument to the idea that even in our divided age, reason might prevail. Yet, as the ink dries and regulators roll up their sleeves, the Big Bank lobby, ever the spoilsport, seeks to upend the apple cart. 🍎 Why? Because progress, it seems, is a threat to those who thrive in the murk of the status quo.

The implementation of the GENIUS Act is no trifle. The Treasury Department’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, alongside other federal stablecoin regulators, faces a Herculean task: defining reserve standards, auditing requirements, licensing expectations, and anti-money laundering regimes. 📜 Each decision, a thread in the tapestry of financial innovation, demands time, public engagement, and the kind of careful consideration that extends well into 2026. Yet, the Big Banks, ever impatient, would have Congress short-circuit this process, injecting amendments that serve only their narrow interests. 🏦

Their gambit? To statutorily ban third parties from offering rewards for holding stablecoins, a move that would stifle competition and entrench their dominance. The irony is rich: stablecoins, backed by the safest assets in the financial system-cash and short-term Treasuries-pose no systemic risk. 🛡️ They do not engage in maturity transformation, extend credit, or rely on leverage. Yet, the Big Banks cry foul, their arguments as hollow as a politician’s promise. 🤥

Stablecoin rewards, far from being a threat, are but another tool in the marketplace of incentives. Consumers have long been wooed by rewards-cash bonuses, mileage benefits-yet the Big Banks would deny them this modest boon. Why? Because competition is their kryptonite. 🦇 And when consumers, armed with choice, move their funds freely, the banks see not a vibrant financial system but a threat to their fiefdoms. 🏰

Congress, in its wisdom, foresaw this. The GENIUS Act bans issuers from offering yield but allows third parties to offer rewards. House Financial Services Chairman French Hill, a voice of reason, acknowledges that these questions are best left to the regulatory process. Yet, the Big Banks, ever the spoilers, would have Congress reopen settled issues, risking the very bipartisan trust that made the GENIUS Act possible. 🤝

The stakes are high. If bipartisan agreements can be undone at the whim of incumbent industries, legislative compromise becomes a farce. The responsible path is clear: let Treasury complete its work, allow regulators to grapple with the complexities, and let Congress focus on market structure legislation without revisiting settled issues. Only then, with data in hand and experience gained, can targeted amendments be considered. 📊

The GENIUS Act is a testament to what can be achieved when reason prevails over greed. To honor this work, implementation must come before amendment. For in the end, it is not just the stability of stablecoins at stake, but the very integrity of our legislative process. 🏛️ And if the Big Banks succeed in their folly, they will have proven once again that in the game of power, principles are but pawns. ♟️

Read More

2025-12-19 17:23