🤑 Bitcoin Battle Royale: Strategy vs. MSCI – Who’ll Blink First? 🚀

by

In the dusty plains of Wall Street, where the bulls and bears dance their eternal tango, MicroStrategy, now rechristened as Strategy, has thrown down the gauntlet against Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI). Their sin? Proposing to exile Bitcoin-heavy companies from the hallowed grounds of major equity indexes. Strategy cries foul, claiming they’re being treated like a stray dog in a cat show-unfairly lumped with investment funds. 🐕‍🦺

This drama unfolded after JPMorgan, the town crier of finance, warned that MSCI’s move could unleash a stampede of forced selling, turning Strategy into the eye of a financial hurricane. 🌪️ Billions, they say, could go up in smoke. And so, the stage is set for a showdown that’ll make the O.K. Corral look like a tea party.

Strategy Stands Its Ground, Pitchfork in Hand

On a Wednesday that felt more like a Friday, Strategy fired back with a 12-page letter penned by the dynamic duo of Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and President Phong Le. In it, they argued that MSCI’s proposal was about as accurate as a blind man shooting at a moving target. 🎯 Strategy, they insisted, is no passive fund but a hardworking business that uses its Bitcoin stash to issue credit and raise capital. It’s like calling a tractor a unicycle-just plain wrong.

Strategy has submitted its response to MSCI’s consultation on digital asset treasury companies. Index standards should be neutral, consistent, and reflective of global market evolution. Read our letter and share your support:

– Strategy (@Strategy) December 10, 2025

“We urge MSCI to reject the proposal. It rests on a broad mischaracterization of DATs and would impose arbitrary, unworkable conditions that would stifle innovation, damage the reputation of MSCI’s indices, and conflict with national priorities,” it read. 🧐

Strategy also called out the proposed 50% digital-asset threshold as discriminatory. “Why us?” they wailed, pointing to oil and real estate sectors, which get to hog the spotlight without so much as a raised eyebrow. 🛢️🏢

The Bitcoin Treasuries Hang in the Balance

This saga began in October, when MSCI decided to play god and launched a consultation on how to classify digital asset treasuries (DATs). The 50% threshold immediately put Strategy and its Bitcoin brethren in the hot seat. 🔥 Michael Saylor took to Twitter, declaring, “We’re not a fund, not a trust, and not a holding company. We’re a publicly traded operating company with a $500 million software business and a unique treasury strategy that uses Bitcoin as productive capital.” 🖥️₿

Response to MSCI Index Matter

Strategy is not a fund, not a trust, and not a holding company. We’re a publicly traded operating company with a $500 million software business and a unique treasury strategy that uses Bitcoin as productive capital.

This year alone, we’ve completed…

– Michael Saylor (@saylor) November 21, 2025

JPMorgan, ever the doom-monger, estimated that Strategy could face $2.8 billion in forced-selling pressure if MSCI gives it the boot. And if other index providers follow suit? That number could balloon to $8-9 billion. 💸💨 The public, naturally, is clutching their pearls and watching with bated breath.

For Strategy, the stakes are higher than a giraffe’s hat. Exclusion could dry up liquidity faster than a desert sun and jack up their cost of capital. It could also slam the door on corporate treasuries as a backdoor for Bitcoin exposure. 🏦₿

For investors, this episode raises a thorny question: Should Bitcoin exposure be the exclusive domain of regulated ETFs, or can publicly traded companies keep their digital assets on the balance sheet? It’s a debate that’ll keep the watercooler chatter going for months. ☕

MSCI’s consultation remains open until December 31, with market participants on the edge of their seats. Will MSCI back down, or will Strategy be left out in the cold? Only time will tell. ⏳

Read More

2025-12-10 23:12