Senate’s Crypto Bill: Delayed Until 2026 – Who Needs Certainty Anyway? 🤷‍♂️

Ah, the US Senate, a veritable bastion of legislative prowess, has once again demonstrated its knack for impeccable timing. The eagerly awaited Crypto Market Structure Bill has been pushed into the abyss known as 2026, as lawmakers, those diligent sentinels of democracy, ran out of time due to their own internal squabbles! What a surprise! 🥳

And so, we continue our journey through the murky waters of regulatory uncertainty, where crypto exchanges, issuers, and institutional investors in the US must navigate the choppy seas without the guiding light of clarity.

Why Was the Crypto Market Structure Bill Delayed?

This illustrious bill, constructed on the solid foundation of the House-passed Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act-because who doesn’t love a little clarity, right?-intends to delineate how our precious digital assets are to be governed. It proposes a formal division of oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. A revolutionary idea! If only it were that simple…

But alas, unresolved quarrels over jurisdiction, DeFi oversight, and consumer protections have brought progress to a screeching halt. It seems that when it comes to consensus, the Senate is more like a family dinner where nobody can agree on what to order! 🍕

🚨NEW: In a statement from the Senate Banking Committee, a spokesperson confirmed my earlier report that @BankingGOP will not be holding a market structure markup this year:

“Chairman Scott and the Senate Banking Committee have made strong progress with Democratic counterparts on…”

– Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) December 15, 2025

Negotiators found themselves entangled in a web of confusion, struggling to reconcile the differences between the Banking and Agriculture committees-because nothing says ‘cohesive governance’ like two committees both claiming dominion over crypto spot markets! 🎭

As a result, lawmakers were unable to finalize language that could appease both sides. Such a tragedy!

Then we have the DeFi debate. Some senators, bless their hearts, advocated for exemptions for decentralized protocols that lack a controlling intermediary. Others waved red flags, cautioning that such broad exemptions could leave gaping holes in enforcement. I suppose they prefer a world where regulations are as tight as a drum! 🔒

Consumer advocacy groups, always the party poopers, chimed in, opposing parts of the bill. They argue that the proposed framework shifts power away from the SEC, potentially weakening investor protections after several spectacular crypto disasters. Oh dear, how novel!

This chorus of opposition only further muddied the waters, causing negotiations to crawl at a snail’s pace. 🐌

Yet, despite the delay, the bill stands apart from other crypto legislations already passed. Unlike the GENIUS Act, which is laser-focused on stablecoins-and we all know how stable those can be-the market structure bill aims to encompass the entire crypto trading ecosystem. Quite ambitious!

It lays down rules for exchanges, brokers, custody providers, and token issuers under a unified federal framework-a one-stop-shop for regulatory joy!

But wait, there’s more! The bill goes beyond mere regulation; it introduces formal asset classification standards and seeks to limit the reliance on court rulings to determine whether tokens are securities or commodities. Sounds awfully complicated, doesn’t it? 😅

Lawmakers assure us that this approach will replace regulatory uncertainty with the sparkling clarity of statutory guidelines. How refreshing! And as we await this grand vision, one can only wonder: will 2026 usher in a new era of enlightenment for the crypto realm, or will we still be stuck in the same old bureaucratic quagmire? Only time will tell! ⏳

Read More

2025-12-16 02:19