Ripple vs. Banks: Japan’s Stablecoin Showdown – Who Will Win?

by

Key Highlights

  • Japan’s stablecoin market is growing, but trust in issuers, especially banks, is the biggest factor deciding adoption. (Spoiler: It’s not a popularity contest.)
  • Ripple’s RLUSD is strong in cross-border payments through SBI, but faces competition from Japanese banks building their own stablecoins. (Because nothing says “trust” like a bank with a 100-year-old reputation.)
  • Despite Ripple’s presence, Japanese banks continue to lead in trust, especially for domestic use cases. (Because who wouldn’t trust a bank that once gave you a loan to buy a toaster?)

Japan’s stablecoin market is becoming a key battleground for Ripple’s RLUSD, as it enters a system where trust plays a central role. (Trust, that elusive thing that makes people hand over their money to institutions that once tried to sell them a bridge in Brooklyn.)

The main question is how RLUSD will compete in a market where more people are interested in stablecoins, but they still prefer issuers they already trust and use. (Like their grandma’s advice, but with less hugs and more spreadsheets.)

Ripple’s journey into Japan so far

Japan has long been one of Ripple’s strongest markets. This all started in 2016, when SBI Group, a Japan-based financial service firm, invested in Ripple, which later built a long-term partnership that expanded into real use cases. (Because nothing says “long-term” like a handshake and a contract written in pencil.)

In 2021, SBI Remit launched Japan’s first XRP-based international remittance service. SBI VC Trade also lists XRP as one of its most widely used crypto assets. (Because nothing says “trust” like a company that once had a CEO who thought “crypto” was a type of tea.)

In August 2025, Ripple and SBI announced plans to bring RLUSD in Japan through SBI VC Trade, meaning that the stablecoin is not entering alone but through an already built local system. (Because even a stablecoin needs a sponsor, and SBI’s got the charisma of a well-dressed teapot.)

Strong interest in digital assets, but careful adoption

A survey by Nomura and Laser Digital, conducted between December 2025 and January 2026 on 518 Japanese investment professionals, shows strong institutional interest in digital assets. (Because nothing says “institutional” like a group of people who think “digital” means “not in a vault.”)

According to the survey, 63% of respondents said stablecoins could be used for treasury management and cross-border payments. The scope also includes investment in crypto and tokenized securities. The survey also showed that 65% of respondents view crypto assets as a way to diversify portfolios, with many allocating between 2% and 5% of their total assets. (Because who doesn’t want to diversify into something that could vanish like a poorly timed joke?)

Interest was also high in staking, lending, derivatives, and tokenized assets, with all above 60% among respondents. (Because nothing says “excitement” like a 60% interest rate on a product that might be a scam.)

Trust still decides who wins the stablecoin race

Despite this interest, trust remains the deciding factor. The survey found that stablecoins issued by major financial institutions are dominating the Japanese market. They ranked highest in trust across JPY, USD, and EUR. In contrast, crypto-native issuers ranked lower. This reflects the region’s regulatory structure, where the FSA limits issuance of digital-money stablecoins to only banks, trust companies, and regulated fund transfer services. (Because nothing says “regulation” like a bureaucracy that’s tighter than a nun’s belt.)

Ripple’s RLUSD enters this environment as a dollar-backed stablecoin designed for institutional use. It is backed by US dollar deposits, government bonds, and cash equivalents. (Because nothing says “institutional” like a stablecoin that’s basically a fancy savings account.)

It is also built for compliance and integrated into Ripple Payments for cross-border and treasury flows. Through SBI VC Trade, RLUSD is expected to be listed once approval is complete, placing it inside Japan’s regulated system. (Because nothing says “regulated” like a process that takes longer than a Japanese tea ceremony.)

At the same time, Japanese banks are not standing still. MUFG, Mizuho, SMBC, and Mitsubishi UFJ Trust, along with Progmat, are reportedly working on joint stablecoin projects with support from regulators. (Because nothing says “collaboration” like banks teaming up to outdo each other.)

SBI is also working on other stablecoin plans, including support from Circle and studies on yen-based stablecoins with SMBC. (Because nothing says “innovation” like a bank that’s finally figured out how to make a yen stable.)

Different issuer, different use cases

The report suggests how different use cases may favor different issuers. For instance, RLUSD is stronger in cross-border payments, as well as making international money transfers happen easily. (Because nothing says “easy” like a system that’s been tested by the entire world.)

But stablecoins backed by banks are stronger when it comes to domestic payment and settlement of tokenized securities, meaning the market is split based on the financial use. (Because nothing says “split” like a market that’s too busy arguing to agree on anything.)

Ripple already has strong payment networks in Asia through SBI. It has remittance routes to countries like the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. But Japanese banks are building systems that focus more on local settlement inside Japan. In short, different issuers, different use cases, all developing side by side. (Because nothing says “coexistence” like a market where everyone’s trying to be the best at something no one really understands.)

Broader context

Unlike many other countries where crypto adoption grows freely, Japan is building everything around trust and regulations. This makes it a key place to see how global crypto firms like Ripple perform against traditional banks entering the same space. (Because nothing says “key” like a market that’s as confusing as a Japanese puzzle box.)

The Nomura survey also points out that 31% of investors now feel positive about crypto assets, while negative views have dropped to 18%. Still, adoption barriers remain a concern. (Because nothing says “concern” like a 18% chance of being wrong.)

Ultimately, RLUSD’s success in Japan will depend on how trust is applied. If institutions treat cross-border stablecoins differently from domestic ones, RLUSD may grow in international use. If not, bank-issued stablecoins may dominate most of the market in Japan. (Because nothing says “dominate” like a system that’s been in place since the Edo period.)

Read More

2026-04-17 20:24