CLARITY Act Markup: What Thursday’s Vote Really Means and What’s Next

by

CLARITY Act Thursday Markup Explained: What It Actually Means and What Happens Next

Many people in the crypto world are unsure what happened at Thursday’s Senate Banking Committee meeting regarding the CLARITY Act. To put it simply, just because the committee advanced the bill doesn’t mean it will become law, or even be voted on by the full Senate. It’s only one step in a lengthy process.

Ron Hammond, who leads policy and advocacy work at Wintermute, explained the current situation and its significance.

What a Markup Actually Is

As a crypto investor, I’ve been following this bill closely, and I’ve learned that ‘markup’ is basically the stage where the committee really digs into it. They debate it, make changes, and ultimately vote on the final version before it moves forward. It’s like they’re polishing the bill and giving it its final form before sending it to the next step in the process.

This Thursday, Senator Tim Scott, who leads the Senate Banking Committee, will share an initial version of the bill. Committee members will then be able to suggest changes. The committee will vote on these proposed changes, and finally, on whether to move the bill forward. If the bill passes this vote, it will proceed to the next step in the legislative process. However, if it doesn’t pass, the bill will not move forward any further.

Why Amendments Are Flying In From Every Direction

Hammond highlighted that the large number of amendments—over 100—reflects the unusual nature of this bill. Major legislation of this scale rarely comes before the Senate Banking Committee. In the last ten years, the committee has only passed three significant bills: Dodd-Frank, a follow-up to Dodd-Frank, and the GENIUS Act. That’s all they’ve passed.

Big financial bills often attract attempts by senators to add their own special interests. Things lawmakers try to include, like rules for prediction markets, have been added and then taken out before. For example, a plan to increase competition among credit card companies was briefly part of one bill but didn’t make it into the final version. Currently, a housing-related item is reportedly in the draft of the CLARITY Act, and many believe it’s a political concession intended to gain the support of at least one Republican senator from Louisiana.

According to Hammond, Senators frequently try to add provisions to bills. Opportunities like this don’t come up very often.

What Happens After Thursday

Even if the bill passes the Banking Committee on Thursday, there’s still a lot of work to do. The Banking Committee has only covered about half of the bill; the other half was approved by the Agriculture Committee. Now, both versions need to be combined and made consistent, which could take another two to three weeks.

As the bill takes its final shape, the hard part starts: getting it passed. It needs 60 votes in the Senate, which means nearly all Republicans and at least nine or ten Democrats must support it. Senate leaders won’t even allow a vote unless they’re certain they have those 60 votes. Everyone in Washington remembers a past healthcare debate, when a single unexpected ‘no’ vote unexpectedly killed the bill at the last minute, and they’re determined not to repeat that mistake.

Getting Democrats who haven’t committed to the bill on board will require individual conversations. Each Democrat will likely have their own requests, and the difficult part will be meeting those requests without creating conflicts or losing the support of Republicans.

The Real Question Heading Into Thursday

Over the next 24 hours, the key question is whether Democrats on the Banking Committee will support the bill when they vote on Thursday. If they don’t, it will move forward with only Republican votes. While this is enough to pass it through the committee, it could make it much harder to get the 60 votes needed for approval in the full Senate.

If the committee votes along party lines, Democrats will enter negotiations feeling less optimistic and with more power. However, even a small number of Democratic votes in favor of the bill would dramatically shift the situation, making the upcoming, more difficult debate much different.

Thursday matters. But it is the beginning of the hard part, not the end.

Read More

2026-05-13 18:24