How CZ’s Irony About AI Will Make You Question Humanity (And Laugh!)

by

In the shadowed corridors of modern commerce, where ambition cloaks itself in the guise of progress, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao emerges—an unintentional philosopher or perhaps a clown, depending on your preference. With a voice that wavers between wisdom and satire, he utters a paradox that would make even the most stoic doubt their own sanity. AI Illustration

Who decides what AI is dangerous? A Question That Makes the Mind Spin

So, CZ—this titan of cryptocurrency—declares that despite knowing AI’s potential to devour us all, we race forward like buffoons chasing a carrot. “In order to prevent AI from being dangerous, so we will race to create the most advanced (dangerous) AI,” he states, evidently amused by the farce. It’s as if the puppeteers design the noose while insisting they will hang differently.

He implies that luminaries and titans—those who hold the keys to the future—are in a bizarre dance of contradiction. On one hand, they solemnly vow to regulate and tame this beast, and on the other, they craft new monsters faster than a drunken craftsman at his bench. All the while, they cloak their hubris in the language of safety, but secretly chuckle. A delightful human comedy, or perhaps tragedy? Who can tell anymore? Sarcasm

This misguided carnival has stirred online debate as a user, Abrlien, asks a pertinent question: Who decides what is dangerous? The creator? The code? Or perhaps, the universe itself, which seems to laugh at our pitiful attempts? “And what happens when they both disagree?” he ponders, no less skeptical than a Dostoevsky character pondering the meaning of existence.

So @cz_binance, if we end up creating the most advanced AI to stop dangerous AI…
Who decides which one is dangerous in the first place?
The creators… or the code itself?

And what happens when they both disagree?

— AB (@Abrlien) August 2, 2025

On Responsible Innovation: A Laughing Matter or a Tragedy?

In true Dostoevskian fashion, CZ offers a grim wit: the world will change—whether we embrace it or not. Like pondering the nature of morality, CZ urges us to accept change as an inevitable tide, washing away all resistance. “It will happen with or without you,” he intones, as if our protests are but the squeals of a dying animal.

CZ does not oppose technological progress; no, he merely urges that we remember to do it with some semblance of responsibility—though, frankly, the irony of human ambition is often funnier than any joke. He suggests that perhaps, in the end, refining the product—much like curing a sickness—matters more than racing ahead blindly. A subtle reminder that even in the chaos of innovation, there exists a thread of human folly worth observing and perhaps, mocking.

Read More

2025-08-02 17:01