Coinbase CEO Champions China’s CBDC – But Is He Just Trying to Save His Own Skin?

by

So, it turns out, Coinbase’s very own Brian Armstrong has decided to take a little trip down the rabbit hole of international finance and hold up China as the shining beacon of stablecoin policy. Why? Well, let’s just say it’s convenient timing for him, and we all know how much we love a good coincidence! 🎩✨

Armstrong’s recent defense of China’s digital currency interest payments comes at a time when his company is fighting tooth and nail to protect its precious revenue streams from the clutches of the US banking lobby. You see, the GENIUS Act, which made its grand debut last July, allows platforms like Coinbase to share those sweet, sweet yields with stablecoin holders. But guess what? The banking groups are now plotting to snuff that out faster than my New Year’s resolutions! 💔

What Armstrong Said

On January 8, in a moment that could only be described as “bold” (or “desperate,” depending on your perspective), Armstrong took to X to extol the virtues of China’s approach to digital currency. “China has decided to pay interest on its own stablecoin because it benefits ordinary people, and they recognize it as a competitive advantage,” he bravely typed. “I worry we are missing the forest through the trees in the US.” Trees, forests… I’m pretty sure he’s just hoping someone will hand him a compass! 🌲🧭

He further argued that allowing rewards on stablecoins would help ordinary Americans without causing any drama in the bank lending arena. Because who doesn’t love a little market chaos, right?

China has decided to pay interest on their own stablecoin, because it benefits ordinary people, and they recognize it as a competitive advantage.

I worry we are missing the forest through the trees in the U.S. Rewards on stablecoins will not change lending one bit – but it does…

– Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) January 7, 2026

The Chinese Response

Meanwhile, over in China, the reaction to Armstrong’s comments was akin to watching someone try to explain quantum physics to a cat. Crypto analyst Phyrex pointed out a little oopsie in Armstrong’s argument: the digital yuan isn’t even a stablecoin! 🙈

According to Phyrex, the interest payments are not a testament to competitive prowess but rather a response to the crickets chirping due to low adoption rates. It turns out, the yuan hanging out in WeChat Pay and Alipay earns interest, while the digital yuan previously offered nada. You know, just a minor detail! The new interest program is sponsored by commercial banks, not the central bank, and the rates? Let’s just say they’re lower than my expectations for this year’s holiday gift exchange. 🎁

The GENIUS Act Battle

Armstrong’s comments coincided with a full-blown lobbying brawl over US stablecoin regulation. The GENIUS Act, passed in July 2025, said “no interest for you!” directly to stablecoin issuers but allowed third-party platforms (like, ahem, Coinbase) to dish out “rewards.” Let the games begin! 🥳

But the banking industry wasn’t having any of it. In November, they wrote to the Treasury Department, waving their arms and shouting about how high-yield rewards could lead to deposit outflows threatening up to $6.6 trillion in lending capacity. Sounds a little dramatic, don’t you think? 📉

The lobbying continued like an overzealous campaign for office snacks. On January 7, over 200 community bank leaders sent a letter to the Senate asking lawmakers to expand the GENIUS Act’s interest prohibition to include issuers’ affiliates and partners. Because why not? More rules, more fun! 🤷‍♂️

Armstrong fired back on December 26, declaring any attempt to reopen the GENIUS Act a “red line.” He criticized banks for earning about 4% on reserves while offering depositors pocket change. You know, typical bank shenanigans. 😏

The Limits of the China Comparison

Armstrong’s invocation of China seems aimed at painting a competitive picture: if those folks can do it, why can’t we? The comparison, however, looks about as solid as a house of cards. A CBDC and a private stablecoin are two very different beasts – the digital yuan is legal tender from China’s central bank while USDC and USDT are just dollar-pegged tokens from private enterprises. Critics, like Phyrex, argue that the digital yuan’s interest initiative stems from a struggle for adoption, not some magical competitive edge. 🐰💨

But hey, Armstrong’s main point – that sharing the wealth through yield could benefit the little guy and shouldn’t be restricted – might just resonate, even if his China comparison falls flat. The real debate in the US, however, revolves around how much space private platforms should have to compete with banks for deposits. And if that doesn’t sound like a riveting conversation, I don’t know what does! 🥱

Read More

2026-01-08 05:43