Oh dear, David Sacks, America’s very own crypto and AI czar, has come out swinging against a New York Times (NYT) article that suggested he might have been playing fast and loose with his influential White House role. Apparently, according to the NYT, Sacks pushed policies that served his own tech and crypto buddies. Shocking, right? š
But, wait for it, Sacks isnāt having any of it! Heās called the report a “bungled mess” and even a “nothing burger.” Yes, you heard that right-heās suing the NYT for defamation. Because nothing says “Iām innocent” like a lawsuit, right? š

Sacksā Crypto Portfolio Under Scrutiny
The NYT made the bold claim that Sacks is holding onto 20 crypto investments. Uhm, didnāt the White House say he had sold over $200 million worth of crypto to avoid conflicts of interest? Oops. š
āWhat is clear is that Mr. Sacks, directly or through Craft, has retained 20 crypto and 449 A.I.-related investments, according to The Times analysis.ā
In an absolutely shocking twist (no, not really), the NYT alleges Sacks was pushing for the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin bill, to help his investments in BitGo. And get this-BitGo is about to IPO! But donāt worry, BitGo denies any benefit from the bill. How convenient. š
āIn September, BitGo filed for an initial public offering. Craft owns 7.8 percent of the company, according to financial filings, which would be worth more than $130 million at BitGoās 2023 valuation.ā
For those who havenāt heard of BitGo, itās the service behind USD1, a stablecoin backed by Trumpās World Liberty Financial. Yikes.
Sacksā Crypto Policy Push
So, Sacks started Craft Ventures in 2017 to dive headfirst into tech start-ups. But, donāt worry, he ādivestedā from Bitcoin and Solana to avoid any nasty conflict of interest issues. White House confirmed it earlier this year, but, you know, whoās counting? š¤
As one of the top policy influencers at the White House, Sacks has managed to win some major crypto victories, including the stablecoin law. Still, the BTC reserve bill hasnāt quite made it to the finish line. Could be a plot twist, huh? š
Of course, the crypto world, led by Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino, has jumped to his defense. Ardoino called the attack on Sacks “meritless” and pointed out that the same people going after him are also gunning for Elon Musk. Coincidence? I think not. š
āThe current attack against him is truly meritless. As always, ask yourself who benefits from this. Btw the group attacking him is the same attacking Elon (and Tether).ā
And Perianne Boring (seriously, thatās her name) from Off the Chain Capital is all about defending Sacks too, calling the whole thing a “coordinated attack” on crypto. Makes you wonder if theyāre all secretly on a group text. š±

Final Thoughts
- Sacks is sticking to his guns, denying any conflict of interest, while the NYT claims heās been pushing crypto policies for personal gain. Drama, anyone?
- The crypto world is rallying behind him, with figures like Tether CEO calling the report a total hit job. Plot thickens…
Read More
- Nevada Slaps Kalshi with 14-Day TRO-Prediction Markets in Jeopardy!
- Geminiās Wallet: Web3 Meets Passkeys Without the Crypto Cringe š
- A Stablecoin Scandal: Senators Dance Around the Truth While Crypto Dreams of Regulation
- 65% of Crypto Traders Earn Yield-But Whoās Counting?
- EUR INR PREDICTION
- Brent Oil Forecast
- Bitcoinās Wild Ride: Will It Crash or Soar? Find Out Now! šš°
- Ethereumās DeFi Bet: Putting All ETHs in the Morpho Basket
- UK Cracks Down on Crypto Exchange with a Side of Fake IDs and Big Military Money
- Hong Kong & Stablecoins: Itās Complicated š¤·āāļø
2025-12-01 14:27