Is Xaman’s 0.8% Fee a Tragedy or Just Comedy Gold?

by

Ah, the illustrious Xaman Wallet has decided to impose a 0.8% trading fee, all in the name of sustaining the XRPL infrastructure! And here we thought we could get a cup of tea without paying for the kettle!

Xaman Wallet, with all the flair of a debutante at her first ball, charges a rather chic 0.8% trading fee. Naturally, the XRP community has taken notice-some clutching their pearls in horror. But let’s not forget, dear friends, this fee is for Xaman’s software layer, not the illustrious XRP Ledger itself. A distinction that seems to have vanished faster than a magician’s rabbit.

The XRP Ledger network fee sits at a minuscule 0.00001 XRP. Ten drops, my dears! At any reasonable XRP price, we’re practically talking about pocket change. No one at XRPL Labs has dared to raise that number, nor have they poked the protocol with a stick.

Must Read: XRP Exchange Reserves Drop as On-Chain Data Points to Quiet Accumulation

The Fee Nobody Actually Changed

Our dear friend Jungleincxrp took to X to present the facts in black and white: Ripple crafts software atop the open-source XRP Ledger. No one is demanding that Ripple give it away for free-what a preposterous notion! XRPL Labs does the same jig, and somehow that’s become the latest scandal. This fee? It pays for software, servers, engineers, and the ongoing maintenance required to keep the party going-not for ledger access, mind you!

Now, let’s talk about XRPL validators-bless their hearts! They earn precisely zero block rewards. No mining yield, no staking returns. The lovely folks running nodes do so out of sheer altruism, bless them! Meanwhile, XRPL Labs has been quietly subsidizing a veritable cornucopia of user-facing infrastructure for ages.

That cost, darlings, must go somewhere. Hence, the 0.8% fee is merely part of where the money flows like fine wine at a soirée.

Infrastructure Runs on Something

A full history node on the XRPL, according to our informative friend jungleincxrp, demands roughly 17 terabytes of high-speed NVMe SSD storage as of 2026. And it grows by a staggering 12 gigabytes every day! Hardware, bandwidth, and those oh-so-precious engineers who know how to run the whole shebang-none of that comes free, I assure you.

For comparison, MetaMask was raking in around $150 million annually at its peak. XRPL Labs operates on a shoestring relative to that! A company that can’t cover its costs doesn’t last through a bear market, and if XRPL Labs takes a tumble, well, the gateway to the entire ledger just might go with it. What a tragedy!

You might also like: Evernorth Is Turning XRP Into a Yield Machine

The Model Shifted in January

On January 30, 2026, Xaman decided to bid adieu to its Pro subscription and move towards a more sensible usage-based fee structure. Pay only when you use a service, rather than a flat monthly rate that assumes you’re using it, which seems a touch too optimistic, wouldn’t you agree?

XRPL_Commons, posting on X, pointed out something the broader debate keeps sidestepping like a clumsy dancer in a waltz: users can choose their poison! Use Xaman, pick another app, or send directly to the ledger. A delightful buffet of options keeps the XRPL functioning, and no one is being dragged kicking and screaming onto Xaman. Free alternatives are lurking nearby like wallflowers at a ball.

The outrage seems to suggest that wallet software ought to operate outside the realm of normal business economics. Internet pipes don’t charge per data packet, yet Netflix continues to charge. How very scandalous! The protocol and service layer-my dears, they are two distinct entities, much like oil and water.

Must Read: Japan to Classify XRP as Financial Product by Q2

Xaman’s Fees Against the Benchmark

Jungleincxrp noted on X that Xaman’s fees sit lower than or comparable to those of MetaMask. Ethereum users, bless their hearts, understand the difference between protocol costs and software layer costs. That clarity seems to elude the dear XRPL community amidst this uproar. No one cries foul over MetaMask ruining Ethereum, after all!

The deeper, unspoken assumption at play here is that software built on a thrifty network should itself be free. A charming idea until you realize it falls apart faster than a soufflé in a thunderstorm. A mechanic doesn’t offer free labor just because gasoline is inexpensive, now does he?

You might also like: Zero Confirms ZRO as Sole Token for Staking, Gas, and Fees

Real builders require real revenue, darling! The XRPL protocol remains as frugal as ever. Xaman is merely trying to keep the lights on while running the infrastructure; much of that cheap network traffic depends on whether the community wakes up to this reality before the next bear market decides to crash the party.

Read More

2026-02-21 22:36