JPYKRW

In the latest exhibition of discourse on the stage of social media, Mr. Saylor, with a twinkle in his eye, did converse with Mr. Cardone-a gentleman of notable achievements in both property and the evangelization of Bitcoin. The chairman assured all bearers of good manners and understanding that Bitcoin has, quite resolutely, steadied itself and is thus prepared for an ascent. He professed, with a flourish, that “most of the liquidation selling has discreetly exited the system,” leaving behind only the echoes of its tumultuous passing.

Amanda Fischer, former right-hand to SEC’s Gary Gensler, basically said Uniswap’s decentralization was about as real as a gluten-free donut. 🍩 According to her, they only cared about it when it kept the lawyers at bay. Now that the heat’s off, it’s like, “Decentralization? Never heard of her.” 🤷‍♀️

Unless this relentless selling abates – and one always questions the nature of such abatement – Bitcoin risks a plunge towards the ignominious depths of $94,000. A return to $99,000? A pleasant fantasy, perhaps, but only if a new wave of demand washes over the market. A demand, I might add, suspiciously absent at present.

So, instead of obsessing over price charts like my ex with her horoscope, we’re looking at user activity. You know, the stuff that actually matters. Unique wallets, seven days, no fluff. Turns out, it’s the best way to see who’s winning and who’s just pretending. 🕵️♂️

One in three developers straddles multiple chains, a circus act of hedging bets. Wrapped tokens? More like wrapped in red tape, hopping chains like fugitives with forged passports. The bottleneck? It’s not the technology-it’s the ego of each chain, insisting it’s the chosen one. 🙄

The mechanism, naturally, is complex. Taproot Assets, a construct of dubious spiritual weight, facilitating exchanges between Bitcoin and those flimsy stablecoins… it’s all rather exhausting, isn’t it? They speak of automating liquidity management, of treasuries generating revenue without the vulgarity of lending or staking. It’s a system built on shadows and algorithms, a desperate attempt to wring blood from a stone. The very air around it crackles with the scent of… well, let’s call it hope. Foolish, fragile hope. bitcoin

A fellow calling himself KriptoCenneti – a name which, frankly, sounds like a particularly unpleasant Turkish delight – has observed that Bitcoin’s ‘Funding Rate’ (whatever that is) remains stubbornly positive. Apparently, even as the price has tumbled from an almost immodest height of over $110,000 to a distinctly less impressive $96,000, these ‘funding rates’ have held firm between 0.003% and 0.008%. A curious situation, wouldn’t you agree? It seems our speculators are rather determined to remain long, regardless of the rather obvious trajectory.

The crypto market’s long-term outlook? Stronger than my coffee after a 3 AM rewrite. Despite October and November’s “plot twist” (prices tanked, investors cried into their avocado toast), Horsley-CEO of Bitwise, aka the grown-ups in the room-remains weirdly optimistic. 🚀

Rising demand for resilient digital-asset infrastructure is accelerating a global shift toward tokenized finance, creating urgency for standards that can support cross-border scale and credible settlement. Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Managing Director Chia Der Jiun shared on Nov. 13, 2025 at the Singapore Fintech Festival 2025 that stablecoins and interoperable tokenization frameworks are central to this next phase. 🕵️‍♂️

Behold, the market, with its eternal penchant for repetition, presents us with a spectacle as ancient as the stars themselves. Bitcoin, ever the prima donna, retraces her steps to the tune of 61.8%, a number so divine it could only be the work of Daedalus himself. 🕰️🔮