Powell’s Perils: DOJ’s Farce Fizzles, Warsh’s Waltz Begins

by

In a twist as predictable as a third-rate melodrama, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) has abandoned its quixotic quest to impale Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on the altar of political expediency. The probe, as flimsy as a debutante’s excuses for a late arrival, has been unceremoniously dropped, clearing the path for Kevin Warsh’s ascent to the throne of monetary policy.

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro, with a volte-face as abrupt as a society matron spotting a faux pas, announced the decision on Friday. This, after her earlier pledge to appeal a judge’s order blocking her office’s grand jury subpoenas-a pledge as durable as a weekend resolution to abstain from cocktails.

A Farce in Three Acts: The DOJ’s Grand Jury Inquiry

The probe, which began in January with all the subtlety of a brass band at a funeral, centered on Powell’s June 2025 Senate testimony regarding the Fed’s headquarters renovation. Prosecutors, with the tenacity of a terrier chasing a phantom, questioned whether Powell had misled senators about the scope of work on the Eccles and East buildings. The costs, ballooning to a staggering $2.5 billion from an initial $1.9 billion, were blamed on inflation, asbestos, lead remediation, and the sacred cow of historic preservation. No charges were filed, of course, for the simple reason that there was nothing to charge.

Chief US District Judge James Boasberg, with the patience of a saint and the wit of a Waugh character, quashed the DOJ’s subpoenas on March 13 and reaffirmed his ruling on April 3. He noted that prosecutors had produced “essentially zero evidence” of a crime, a statement as damning as a dowager’s raised eyebrow at a provincial tea party.

FLASH: Federal judge James Boasberg QUASHED subpoenas from Trump Admin into Fed chair Jerome Powell

Judge: “A mountain of evidence suggests that the Government served these subpoenas on the Board to pressure its Chair into voting for lower interest rates or resigning. On the…”

– Scott MacFarlane (@MacFarlaneNews) March 13, 2026

The judge also suggested that the subpoenas served a “pretextual” purpose, aimed at pressuring Powell over interest rate decisions. Pirro, with the indignation of a spurned socialite, rejected this framing and declared on April 22 that she would appeal. Two days later, her office referred the cost overruns to the Fed’s inspector general, an internal watchdog with the tenacity of a bloodhound and the discretion of a butler.

“I have directed my office to close our investigation as the IG undertakes this inquiry…I will not hesitate to restart a criminal investigation should the facts warrant doing so,” wrote Pirro in a Friday afternoon post as dramatic as a last-minute cancellation of a weekend house party.

Tillis’s Ultimatum: A Political Masterpiece

The closure removes a political obstacle as inconvenient as a rain shower during a garden party for Kevin Warsh, the Trump nominee to succeed Powell when the chair’s term ends on May 15. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, a Republican on the Senate Banking Committee with the strategic acumen of a chess grandmaster, had withheld his vote until prosecutors walked away. Tillis, during Warsh’s April 21 hearing, dismissed the investigation as “bogus” and “frivolous,” declaring that dropping it could be done in “five minutes.” A man of action, indeed.

“If we want to get Mr. Warsh confirmed, we need to drop the investigation.”

Warsh, a former Fed governor under George W. Bush, assured senators that he would not act as Trump’s “sock puppet.” His confirmation would place a Trump ally atop the central bank weeks before the Federal Open Market Committee’s June meeting, a development as inevitable as the changing of the seasons.

Powell, ever the stoic, had publicly described the probe as retaliation for Fed rate policy. His term as chair ends next month, though he can remain as a governor until 2028, a prospect as comforting as a well-stocked cellar after a long winter.

The CLARITY Act: A Sideshow of Compromise

The decision reshapes the Senate Banking Committee’s near-term calendar, freeing up bandwidth for the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, the House-passed crypto bill awaiting Senate markup. Tillis, the lead Republican negotiator on stablecoin yield language, had pushed the committee to delay the markup from April to May, citing the need for more stakeholder input from banks. The North Carolina Bankers Association, ever vigilant, urged members to lobby his office for tighter restrictions on rewards tied to stablecoin balances.

Banks, predictably, want a full ban on passive yield, while crypto firms advocate for activity-based incentives. A partial compromise allowing rewards tied to third-party platform usage has circulated but remains as elusive as a perfectly mixed martini.

With Warsh’s confirmation no longer tethered to the DOJ case, the committee can focus on the crypto markup during the week of May 11, the earliest feasible window. Industry groups, with the anxiety of hosts awaiting tardy guests, have warned that further delays could push meaningful market-structure reform into 2027.

The Fed inspector general’s review and Warsh’s committee vote are the next pressure points. Whether the Powell case returns in any form may hinge on what the watchdog finds in the renovation records, a prospect as intriguing as a gossip column in a society magazine.

Read More

2026-04-24 18:01