Stablecoin Shenanigans: USD1’s Brush with Financial Folly

by

Egad, what a to-do! World Liberty Financial, those stalwart guardians of the crypto realm, declare their USD1 stablecoin was subjected to a most dastardly plot-hacked cofounder accounts, paid influencers spreading rot, and short positions so aggressive they’d make a bear market blush. Yet, they insist, the scoundrels failed most spectacularly.

USD1 Takes a Tumble, But Rallies Like a True Sport

What ho! World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a crypto outfit with ties to the Trump clan, claims their flagship stablecoin, USD1, was the target of a multi-pronged assault. The poor dear briefly wobbled off its $1 peg, but recovered with the pluck of a true English gentleman after a spot of tea.

“A dashed inconvenient attack was launched against USD1 this morning,” WLFI trumpeted. “Rascals hacked cofounder accounts, paid influencers to spread FUD, and opened shorts so massive they’d make a Rothschild blush. All to profit from the manufactured chaos, don’t you know.”

They added, with a stiff upper lip:

“It didn’t work, old bean. Thanks to USD1’s sound mint-and-redeem mechanism and full 1:1 backing, we’re trading steadily at par. No scammer can rattle the long-term commitment of the WLFI team and cofounders. We say, rely only on verified channels for accurate information, what?”

According to market data from Feb. 23, USD1 dipped to roughly $0.99422, a mere 0.6% below its intended $1 peg. Coingecko’s API reveals the lowest it’s gone is $0.9896 per unit on Oct. 1, 2025. The token later traded near $0.998, suggesting redemption flows and arbitrage activity steadied the ship.

USD1, launched in April 2025, is a fiat-backed stablecoin designed to maintain a 1:1 peg with the U.S. dollar. Issued through Bitgo Trust Company in South Dakota, it’s backed by U.S. Treasuries and cash equivalents. As of February, USD1 boasted a market capitalization of about $5.02 billion, with 24-hour trading volume near $1.73 billion. Not too shabby, eh?

WLFI assures no core systems were compromised and emphasizes the stablecoin’s mint-and-redeem structure allows holders to exchange tokens directly for dollars. This mechanism, common among asset-backed stablecoins, is meant to counter short-term price dislocations. Jolly good show, if it works.

Still, not everyone’s convinced. Some chaps on X questioned whether the incident was a coordinated campaign or simply market volatility amplified by social media. As of publication, no independent forensic report confirming the alleged hack or paid influencer activity has been released. Rather fishy, if you ask me.

The broader context adds layers of scrutiny, old sport. WLFI is chummily associated with Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Jared Kushner, who reportedly hold a combined majority stake in the venture. In January, the firm applied for a national trust bank charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), seeking federal oversight for its stablecoin operations. Quite the ambitious bunch, these chaps.

Critics have also pointed to concentration risks. Binance is estimated to control about 87% of USD1’s circulating supply, a figure that’s fueled debate over liquidity and decentralization. Supporters argue institutional participation strengthens demand; skeptics counter that concentration can magnify volatility during stress events. A bit of a pickle, that.

The episode revives familiar questions about stablecoin resilience. Even fully collateralized tokens can face temporary dislocations if sentiment shifts quickly or large positions are deployed against them. Whether WLFI’s account of events proves accurate, the incident demonstrates how digital assets can become battlegrounds for narrative warfare as much as price speculation. Quite the drama, really.

For now, USD1 appears to be holding much closer to its $1 peg. Whether independent analysts step in to examine the alleged attack more closely may determine how this chapter is remembered-as a failed strike or a warning shot. We shall see, won’t we?

FAQ 🔎

  • What happened to USD1 on Feb. 23, 2026?
    USD1 briefly dipped to about $0.994 after WLFI alleged a coordinated attack involving hacked accounts, influencer campaigns, and short positions. A bit of a wobble, but nothing a stiff drink couldn’t fix.
  • Did USD1 lose its dollar backing?
    WLFI says USD1 remains fully backed 1:1 by U.S. dollar reserves and related equivalents. Steady as she goes, old chap.
  • Was the alleged attack independently verified?
    As of publication, no independent forensic report has confirmed WLFI’s claims. Rather sketchy, if you ask me.
  • Why is USD1 under added scrutiny?
    WLFI’s political ties and the concentration of supply on Binance have drawn regulatory and community attention. Quite the spotlight, eh?

Read More

2026-02-23 20:27